<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Need for a real .NPO
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Need for a real .NPO
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 06:46:38 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XRjIE+BC2T1AppsL+GBy3E6o++3eUTcxdvq6JE2l7bKM9jTDnT2W5iepAEYCIx3Nq58KCrpfthYRkTB1jpa7fDVS7jC0BRMDpQvsWwoAWklq2uJa4AaRXKP8DXTfNaLo1uqkEQrd3dogkkaBVkcwtJd5S5kdQH2obXqMhoenVmc= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Good enough. I agree, we need a legitimate .NPO.
As an embarrasing side note; for about four months i thought .org stood for Organism.
Then about a year ago, aftter reviewing its' use for a ccTLD concern, sadly i realized i was right. This was confirmed after some studies i made for charities before during and after Katrina and the Tsunami. Org is missused to further schemes which require the appearance of what the public considers .ORG. In your line of work this must be quite sad.
e
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|