<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [Politech] Root server operator says he'd ignore Bush administration overreaching on domains [econ]
- To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: [Politech] Root server operator says he'd ignore Bush administration overreaching on domains [econ]
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:14:14 -0800
- Cc: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <438C980E.2060501@well.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Declan and all,
Very interesting reading indeed. One has to wonder who works for
whom and whom is in charge, ICANN or DOC/NTIA?
Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Following is excerpted from a Q&A with Axel Pawlik, a very interesting
> fellow who is a managing director at RIPE. It's a regional address
> registry and operates the "K" root server, which along with the other
> root servers maintains the list of top-level domains.
>
> Axel's views are noteworthy because the root servers effectively serve
> as a check on the power of the Bush administration, which said this
> summer that it wants to be the only one to "authoriz[e] changes or
> modifications" to the list of top-level domains:
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/USDNSprinciples_06302005.htm
>
> -Declan
>
> ---
>
> http://news.com.com/Root+servers+The+real+Net+power/2008-1028_3-5961465.html
>
> [...snip...]
>
> Q: What would happen if the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
> Numbers (ICANN) decided to approve a new top-level domain--say .xxx--and
> the Bush administration decided to veto it?
>
> Axel Pawlik: In that case, I don't know what the root server operators
> would do. Likely they would publish whatever is approved by ICANN. There
> is a difference between the content and the publication. We're only
> publishers of the root zone file. We take it from IANA (a function of
> ICANN) and we publish it.
>
> Q: Let's say the Bush administration accuses Syria of fostering
> terrorism and decides to invade. And it demands that ICANN remove
> Syria's .sy domain from the Internet. What would you do?
>
> Axel Pawlik: I don't believe that the U.S. government would be that
> stupid. Seriously, this has never come up. But I am quite certain that
> the Internet community at large would not like that decision and I'm not
> sure it would be carried through.
>
> [...snip...]
> _______________________________________________
> Politech mailing list
> Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|