Re: [alac] RE: [alac-admin] Re: [ga] More ALAC Follies

[sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Vittorio, you sidestepped the entire issue once more as is your wont... so
with ALL DUE RESPECT please explain to us how certain ALAC structures were
approved when they DO NOT HAVE A WEB SITE NOR ANY WEB BASED MECHANISM TO
FACILITATE PUBLIC DISCUSSION/INPUT?

Respectfully,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos


> sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ha scritto:
>> Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>>we do not grant exclusives to our
>>>applicants, we just verify whether they meet some basic criteria.
>>
>>
>> What criteria?!  As Richard Henderson pointed, out most of your approved
>> alac 'structures' don't even have a web site, and those few who do have
>> NO
>> web based mechanisms for user interaction/input/discussion!
>>
>> Give it up Vittorio!  The sham is now patently clear to everyone.  You
>> and
>> your alac DO NOT represent dns users in any way shape or form; you
>> represent yourselves and you're simply another group of snouts feeding
>> at
>> the ICANN trough as Abel Wisman pointed out...  Shame on you (but you
>> probably have no concept of shame anyway).
>
> Sorry, you and some other long-time GA participants seem to have a very
> strange concept of dialogue. I am more than happy to discuss successes
> and failures of the ALAC model both publicly and privately - in fact,
> this is one of the major items on our Vancouver agenda - but only on the
> basis of reciprocal respect.
> Thanks,
> --
> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>