ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Staff Reports

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Staff Reports
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:00:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UF+rPROLP+p+c5V9SGtnpnuwlYjfQ80rjGUtM8/1UIDspzSh8jhE84XoM3Dz4QZPoidF464beAVcmHdbCuNo7zk6uLnfc+3jRbRAVl4kH8JQ0Ds+kE17Lmwj1WhKdNOXQtHIPNVMaLZkG+zgvF9LXWnWBPEX32WDHi8OzN/wBhs= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bret Fausett in a note to the ALAC list writes:

"I'm also concerned about process, but I've bitten my
blog tongue on that one until after we've sorted out
the merits. I think you're right though that ICANN
staff is too invested in this and cannot be objective.
I've seen some of the reports they have been given to
the Board, and they read a lot like the Q&A on the
ICANN site. I think the Board should retain
independent advice on this. The staff is trying to
sell them on something, and at least from what I've
seen, I do not believe the reports are objective or
accurate."
http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac/msg01349.html




	
		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>