<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:33:30 -0800
- Cc: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <20051124174222.4177.qmail@web52915.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,
As ICANN has had and still does have bottom up process problems
that plague it's legitimacy as well as has rightly to a great degree
earned
the distrust of many stakeholders/users world wide, I have to agree
with Richard to a degree and you also Dr. Deirker to the extent
that part of Richards response was not offering a solution nor
defining what the real problem is.
Hugh Dierker wrote:
> This would be unnattainable. For in responding you would reveal too
> much and therefor
> become transparent. Which may lead to problems of
> bottom up involvement ;-)
> e
>
> Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ICANN should also develop a "Responsiveness Policy" where they
> undertake to
> respond to mail in "x" days because that is also part of being open
> and
> transparent: not just evading reasonable questions because it suits
> them to
> ignore correspondence. And they should make themselves accountable to
> third-party scrutiny if they fail to uphold their Responsiveness
> Policy.
>
> Come to that, the concept of a much more independent third-party
> ombudsman/woman would also be a good step towards openness and
> transparency.
>
> The only accountability that really matters to ICANN is its
> accountability
> to the DoC of the USA.
>
> That is insufficient accountability.
>
> Richard H
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vittorio Bertola"
> To: "Danny Younger"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Coalition For ICANN Transparency
>
>
> > Danny Younger ha scritto:
> > > I spotted an interesting website at
> > > http://www.cfit.info/
> >
> > I'm not sure about who is behind the initiative, but I think it's
> due
> > time that ICANN works out how to make its accountability and
> > transparency much better. Actually, we released a statement in
> > Luxembourg to this effect:
> > http://www.icann.org/presentations/alac-statements-lux-14jul05.pdf
> > and, of course, it was duly ignored. I think we'll get back on this
> > matter in Vancouver.
> > --
> > vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> > http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Personals
> Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
> Lot's of someone's, actually. Yahoo! Personals
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|