<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ISOC Captures ALAC
- To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] ISOC Captures ALAC
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:44:56 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rkviY5DV7I3KSjX9VZRwnzRq/MeBc16WUgi8SaKvItEd4o8oSTTadZoWC8eM/jIURvcWAq5RIJxqqebBM+NXCR0BIa2kBCtX+Q8lU47pPJd/51XgWyuoZZoQPRpNSaFk3qjiFCoenYZF4jziGqPvZ2iMZS2CYwtNKJZJw6FiFGk= ;
- In-reply-to: <43692C45.BA0BAAC8@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff,
Re: "It seems that Danny Younger also does not
support an At-Large that allows of individual members
from his earlier comments on this thread related to
the NCUC."
If organizations choose to participate in the ALAC
debacle, that is their prerogative. That does not
imply that I do not support At-Large representation
for individuals.
Let the organizations have their play-space, as long
as individual contributors have a venue wherein DNS
policy matters can be debated (with mechanisms that
allow policy considerations to be advanced to the
Board -- we need our own constituency).
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|