<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] XXX and Porn Spam
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] XXX and Porn Spam
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zs92hwcpey+Oa1cuFo/lwNPgb8/l81YZ5wNsng5EVr9wqVMla2GH3o17nEEoSjcZuntqKIdkWPQsq0/ioWfxbiGCToH5ZngJLN6/I0t/gOE1/eiIGuT5PWqWdpzW2fTMqjWpA6hTx2gMUVNJQrKHDu17vDA4rJtPmJCESP58Khs= ;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This article is really a hoot, or is that a hooter. http://www.circleid.com/article/1107_0_1_0_C/
Why an XXX? Somebody really! It adds nothing to the net and prohibits no conduct offensive, and protects no children and only provides a money niche for ICANN.
Meanwhile the porn spam has dropped to a mere trickle. It would appear that some spammers paid for a large package deal for a full two weeks, or three or four of spams at about two a day.
I wonder if it is financially effective. If it is at least it ain't my money.
e
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|