ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Dates and Shananigans

  • To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] Dates and Shananigans
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=e2BT8giu7uiUWV9OLiDdHonr4OYGNHGJ1i+EptgleLnbWssfDcaKln1p6xdRw/uTKEQGjznjPXcwekXbCLt1SnKQaWKFKLZuLyNqKK4xoRA1esLwYrI5N2tVT571Jr7E/zqgiFr+wWkNU7hRQIDCMWith6rba0r/+kywbH3Si24= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Upon further research into Telcordia and .NET I find the dates and lack thereof interesting.
ICANNS posted on May 3rd. with apparently no date of authorship;

ICANN Posts Telcordia Review of Findings
Telcordia published a review of their evaluation report in light of letters received from .NET applicants and responded to the questions raised.
3 May 2005


Telcordias revision dated May 2nd. Posted some 20+ days later. If I were suspicious I would conclude that there was a preordained conclusion with public knowledge and input being a facade. Colusion in the writing and preparing and release of data in order to give the appearance of propriety and openness and transparency and actually listening to input. Well orchestrated stage presence but faulty in execution. But then again who cares until they are screwed by a fate complete?

e



		
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site!
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>