<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Recent ICANN BoD resolutions regarding Bylaws changes, ect..
- To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Recent ICANN BoD resolutions regarding Bylaws changes, ect..
- From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:16:06 +0100
- References: <42633689.AECA0356@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is not *how many* representatives each constituency has that concerns me,
but the *distribution* of representatives. I take the view that some
'constituencies' have an influence and representation that is
disproportionate, in comparison with consumers (for whom the Internet and
its tiny 'supply industry' are supposed to exist).
The clever stack of cards constructed by ICANN results in consumer interests
being marginalised in terms of representation, when they should be central.
Whether each constituency has 'two' representatives or 'three'
representatives is neither here nor there: even if it was 'a hundred'
representatives the imbalance would still remain.
Yrs,
Richard Henderson
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:24 AM
Subject: [ga] Recent ICANN BoD resolutions regarding Bylaws changes, ect..
> All former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,
>
> FYI
> In you the stakeholders/users names...
>
> See: http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-08apr05.htm
>
> IMHO as well as a number of our members opinion there are a
> number of troubling resolutions that we believe are not in the
> best or expressed interest of the stakeholders/users..
>
> I would be interested in any participant of this forum opinion
> whom wishes to express same publicly...
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> Pierre Abelard
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|