<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Care needed over the .travel Registry Agreement
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Care needed over the .travel Registry Agreement
- From: Marcus Gilmore <marcusgilmore@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:41:48 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=lxw2KTBIgBn035AIycijimrgDoODRKnuo7JGCuI81pIDR+5+9+SFxLVrpgI0Wdn1qIRKCiiMzke1Vk+k8graHv7UbRsbFM8/Mdwbf5iQ3+auNMQSfZ2prtBTclnR0l+gQcHQYwrHQjRt1Vpt0T3rl63QLDq3/EUDGU3VDnqOZeM=
- In-reply-to: <424FDB1B.39AF7E3A@ix.netcom.com>
- References: <20050403083918.77192.qmail@web52904.mail.yahoo.com> <424FDB1B.39AF7E3A@ix.netcom.com>
- Reply-to: Marcus Gilmore <marcusgilmore@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Umm.. registrants of .travel have expressed concerns? Fraud in the
.travel namespace is being perpetrated? Are you talking the .travel in
New.net "root" or just spreading up FUD as you go along? There has
been no fraudulent registrations in the .pro tld either so no one is
"accountable". Should anyone start deleting registrations they would
open themselves up for huge lawsuits.
/Marcus
On Apr 3, 2005 2:01 PM, Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
> stakeholders/users,
>
> Evidently an number of registrants of .pro and .travel care as it
> seems many
> have expressed concerns and registered complaints...
>
> Fraudulent business practices should never be allowed to stand.
> It would appear that in the .pro and .Travel name spaces/sTLD's
> a form of fraud is being perpetrated. Whom should be held?
> accountable? The registry? The registrar? ICANN?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|