<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Introducing changes based on a consensus process
- To: Thomas Barrett - EnCirca <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Introducing changes based on a consensus process
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 20:56:06 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=nRen/TBE1nXegXDgG09j3ZF9p7gBWU/fxxQ3ikcOcHXUBCpKWPoUtmfZp4hBy7glcxcNN/jxoObg1S4XtHEEki1X+7CS0omPgRjfBM01GeEM6PyourSisHC4JIZvP772mZaM7JEw1lB7Yq7VMIpZivv8EYAG1fcy4n/I3K4E8OI= ;
- In-reply-to: 6667
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A "confidence man" speaks.
Am I, the epitome of ignorance of engineering so truly ignorant? Has dotcommoner lost all meaning? Have us stupids been working here for half a decade for nothing?
Please think of the user and not the middleman entrepeneur or the corp somethin or other.
e
Thomas Barrett - EnCirca <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard said:
"The entire DNS industry should ensure that the public has the highest confidence that changes are being introduced to the DNS according to a well-defined process based on consensus... The Internet Community, as well as the various ICANN constituencies deserves clarity in the process ICANN uses."
I wonder if you can guess which registrar said that?
=============
Dear Richard,
I'll own up to this!
And I'll be looking for your full support in insisting that a consensus process be followed for any contractual admendments that you, ICANN or anyone else wants to propose for .pro.
Thanks in advance,
Tom Barrett
EnCirca, Inc.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|