Re: [ga] Introducing changes based on a consensus process

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  Mr. Barrett, to start with it would seem reasonable to adhere to your
own registration agreement/contract.  It would also seem appropriate
that you police expediently all those already documented violators
of said agreement/contract without delay and not allow for registrations

such as "pussy.pro" to be considered "professional organizations" and
than
further claim you have reviewed the relevant documentation for such
a registration and allowed for "pussy.pro" as a legitimate "professional

organization."

  I am positive that amongst our members and surely other professional
women's organizations, such a registration of a domain name [ pussy.pro
]
is particularly offensive in the extreme.  I personally find it very
offensive
to have a discriptaive/vanacular part of a woman anatomy as a domain
name as if it was a "professional organization" considered even remotely

legitimate.  "Sluts.pro" also would have the same consideration..

Thomas Barrett - EnCirca wrote:

>    Richard said:
> "The entire DNS industry should ensure that the public has the highest
>
> confidence that changes are being introduced to the DNS according to a
>
> well-defined process based on consensus... The Internet Community, as
> well
> as the various ICANN constituencies deserves clarity in the process
> ICANN
> uses."
>
> I wonder if you can guess which registrar said that?
>
> =============
>
> Dear Richard,
>
> I'll own up to this!
> And I'll be looking for your full support in insisting that a
> consensus
> process be followed for any contractual admendments that you, ICANN or
>
> anyone else wants to propose for .pro.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Tom Barrett
> EnCirca, Inc.
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827