Re: [ga] ICANN seeks to amend the .Pro contract to prevent registration abuses

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  ICANN is seeking to do nothing with this correspondence.  It is only
seeking to "Take the temperature" of EnCirca and RegistryPro to see
IF they will consider some amendments to their own Registry agreement
for .Pro domain names and the "Pro-Forwarding Service".  Basically
ICANN is asking for permission instead of issuing a mandate with
DOC/NTIA's DOC/NTIA's approval.  Basically, milk toast...


Richard Henderson wrote:

>    ICANN have sent a new letter to RegistryPro about the "leasing" of
> restricted domain names to 'second-tier' domain owners:
> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/dam-to-delciello-24mar05.pdf
>
> "ICANN is concerned that EnCirca's Pro-Forwarding Service violates the
> spirit of name restrictions in top-level domains such as .Pro."
>
> "If RegistryPro shares ICANN's concerns about these questionable
> registrations, ICANN would like to discuss whether RegistryPro desires
> to enter into a contract amendment targeted at preventing registration
> abuses."
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827