Re: [ga] WIPO Shutting Out Public Interest Organizations

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

And here it begins again. First a notable person deigns us with their presence. Then they have too hard a time answering what should be simple questions. Then they are insulted and filthied by the rabble. Then they are commiserated by local self proclaimed chieftans. (interesting here but it was the same chieftans that asked the simple questions but are now silent in demanding answers) Saying things like "I for one love to have you visit us here and I am repulsed by the rabble, see what we must deal with"  Then those Chieftans are moved to top down appointed posts that they need not retire from - Harold, Roberto, Vittorio, TR, and now seemingly Danny and SS. And then they agree to hold closed meetings and decide things on closed lists or run websites that require "security" to get in and censor themselves and have sideshows to reveal "accredited" posters.
And the individual is again cut out. And duly elected members of actual elected bodies are castaways because they are Americans god forbid. Even Karl was eventually cast aside, in fact because he was an American.  Show me the last ten hires at ICANN. And I will show you ten non-Americans working for an American Corporation. Yet complaints are abundant that this is an American controlled franchise. But in fact they are censored. 
CIPIH, WHO, UN, WIPO simply are the major dishes served up by a repeating theme. We are fast becoming fodder for socialistic censorship not seen since the "information revolution". But our nation will persevere. Note well America is not what you think of as a nation but in fact an Idea. I have been stoned within my borders by those who call me an American. Yet what they really mean is a United States of America citizen.
Censorship is anti American as the idea not the locale.
 
Eric

Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,

Like ICANN's ALAC, the WTO, WHO, and WGIG, WIPO,
continues its ugly form of censorship... Is the UN truly relevant?

See: http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2005_03.php#003401[3

WIPO Shutting Out Public Interest Organizations
Experts on Development Won't Be Heard at Crucial Meetings
Geneva - Last week, the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) announced that it will shut out most
public interest organizations at two important meetings
devoted to intellectual property and development. As a
result, WIPO delegates from 182 nations will discuss these
issues without hearing from many of the world's
best-qualified experts.
Scheduled for next month, two WIPO "Development Agenda"
meetings will focus on the impact of copyright, patent, and
other intellectual property rights regimes on the
developing world. Without the public interest
organizations, the discussions will be heavily weighted
toward major motion picture studios, broadcasters,
pharmaceutical giants, and other powerful interests that
want to expand copyright and patent law.
"This is an embarrassment for WIPO," explained EFF European
Affairs Coordinator Cory Doctorow. "Settling the debate by
locking one side out of the building isn't the way the UN
is supposed to work. We love the Development Agenda -- it's
supposed to be a new direction for WIPO. A one-sided
discussion isn't a new direction, though. It's just more of
the same."
These meetings are a response to the proposal put forward
by Brazil and Argentina in the wake of the Geneva
Declaration on the future of WIPO, which was signed by
hundreds of individuals and public interest
non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including the
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
Most public interest groups have only recently begun
participating in WIPO and are not yet permanently
accredited by the organization, since the accreditation
process takes a year and they have always been able to
participate as "ad hoc" observers in the past. On March 2,
however, the International Bureau Secretariat advised EFF
that only those NGOs that are currently accredited as
"permanent" observers at WIPO will be allowed to attend
these meetings. As a result, the bulk of civil society will
be barred from attending.
"The Secretariat's exclusion of ad hoc observer NGOs raises
fundamental questions about WIPO's commitment to a full and
thorough discussion of the important issues in the
Development Agenda proposal," said EFF International
Affairs Director Gwen Hinze.
EFF is accredited as a WIPO permanent observer and will be
attending the meetings. The group will be reporting on the
proceedings and will attempt to represent the viewpoints of
some of the other public interest groups that are being
excluded from the process.

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827



		
---------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
 Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web