<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Reminder
- To: "J-F C. \(Jefsey\) Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Reminder
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:21:05 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=PSltgYCCeXPNlOGKFctuLirB2Dllqg6L4cu3RbLZkOybDO3L4yr8pYNwqOpKnS/3LGKCLixPaZHChtp6MT4sbfNAh2Uk1J7cJmQFYGKRC8vsM4Igpm0v+B+NmiHTSC21N0GeKYrswKFFqemcxu9tTzy52hSjahHec8x5DADWpA4= ;
- In-reply-to: <6.1.2.0.2.20050225043249.02770a60@mail.club-internet.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Give me only one large Ivory tower which accomplishes nothing but bares my name and I shall die a happy bureaucrat" the unkown administrator
e
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Danny,
I admire your dedication to the ICANN cause. The real thing is to know in
what the ICANN has helped the Internet to develop (we can all quote many
failures) and honestly evaluate if the pros beat the cons. The ISP (ICANN
Strategic Plan) is only a way to describe what the ISP should says, then to
say it as a description of the status quo, and then to describe an
administrative growth to make it.
I must say that I read the ISP. I must say I fall aslept several times. I
was just dismayed. It could have been written in 10 pages. I may be wrong
but I read it as "nothing new, except it more and more unnecessary
bureaucracy".
jfc
At 03:30 25/02/2005, Danny Younger wrote:
>The comment period for ICANN's Strategic Plan ends in four days. If you
>have any recommendations to make regarding ICANN's structure, future plans
>and initiatives, etc., now is the time to send them in... we should know
>sometime soon whether ICANN will incorporate any of our contributions --
>ICANN staff has promised the GNSO that they will produce a next version of
>the Strategic Plan before the April Mar del Plata meeting (with sufficient
>time for it to be reviewed and consultation developed).
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|