<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] NTIA Nixes Privacy Protection in Whois
- To: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gregg L. DesElms" <gregg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] NTIA Nixes Privacy Protection in Whois
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:05:03 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=VuJ8e6/pJprUZmSUfOfbKNe2zR8+gJpc2J2mrgmQfxJ1yZowk7iHFCaMfllSERyDg3nan+BiCJTAUDRW+s26Fdtt/3qv298SMnG542U8cP+8CJIGoci2X+DHrPB+zW1Z6ajmy2eAFSiXLEICq9s3h2XYlhLezGJOz3Gc2dp9dDA= ;
- In-reply-to: <420D6BEE.5B796CCC@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am very pleased this is getting attention. This is a political animal. And the beast rampaging the forest is the huge IP interests. Now comes along NTIA and makes a completely political non technical call and advisory that is completely outside the expertise of its members. I wonder which PAC paid for that technical determination.
This may be a very bad mistake for IP. This may be just the issue to rally Richards masses.
Eric
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|