Re: [ga] Form of Representation

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

It would appear that your memory is wrong. But if that is what you believe ok.
A simple look proves my point - something does not become "abandoned" by decree.
"abandon ship" is an order. The ship either becomes abandoned or it does not. 
Do I exist? Do my posts here exist? - please look at the address.
This still happens to be the longest lasting repository and publisher of ICANN related material on the net. Is it a Ghost ship?
Here is still the most logical place for individual users to become represented by vote.
 
Eric

Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

I believe the form/forms of stakeholder/user representation have been
discussed and hotly debated on this forum on more than on occasion.
The fractioned results lead to the DNSO and especially the GA to
be abandon by the ICANN BoD by decree. And than a renewed
effort now called the ALAC insued.a

Respectfully the GA was and IMHO remains the best overall model
for stakeholder/user representation if well funded and adequately
promoted. It did work but was undermined by phony and tainted
elections or votes by watchdogs whom were blind or ignored
participants for many and varried invalid reasons. Yet the voting
method/ballots was expectable but perfect.


Hugh Dierker wrote:

> fter deciding that votation is the right floatation to keep the
> sinking user upright, one still has to decide how he is too be
> represented. Clearly if there is the smallest chance of a Springer
> mentality surfacing a direct democracy is out of the question. Lest I
> missed something a monarchy is out of the equation. While it is the
> longest lasting system in the world of "Democracies" it would appear
> that electoral college concepts are out of the question. Politburo
> concepts are dropping like flies around the world and there seems to
> be a reason so they are out of the equation. Council governance like
> those of tribes are good but the stigma attached make them a poor
> choice.
> So far, if the GA was any good indication electing a person and saying
> "go at it and do our will" just did not work. The representatives,
> once elected followed their own agendas, be they good or bad is not at
> issue.
> Funny but the best results I have seen are from voluntary working
> groups. And I do not mean appointed working groups which have had vile
> and dilatory results.
>
> What is the best form of representation for the users of the internet?
>
>
> Eric

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827



		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'