[ga] A new spam twist - Spammers Sue Spamee. Or is it a new twist? Remember Kent Chrispin?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All former DNSO GA members other interested stakeholders/users,

  "In an interesting take on the law, some (alleged) spammers are suing
some poor chap who got them blocked by ISPs due to the fact they
kept sending him spam. According to Spamhaus the company
doing the suing is on their books as spammer, and also as a spyware
company... If this case goes the wrong way, things could get very sticky

for anyone wanting to report spam."

 http://www.silicon.com/research/specialreports/thespamreport/0,39025001,39127148,00.htm

  Does spam/crime pay? Does anyone remember Kent Chrispin?
Could ICANN i.e. Kent, be "Consulting" for Atriks?

 Looks to me that Atriks definitely has spamming tendencies.
Do a search on google on Atriks for yourself...  If it walks like
a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks very much like a duck...
Well, draw  your own conclusions...

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827