Re: [ga] VeriSign Loses == not really?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  Brett is right of course but a little behind the time horizon curve..
I had yesterday posted a very timely and more complete view from
two different press sources.  They were again:
 http://asia.internet.com/news/article.php/3400781
http://news.com.com/VeriSign's+antitrust+suit+against+ICANN+dismissed/2100-1030_3-5326136.html

BTW, his blog seems to be very slow in resolving as well...  None the
less
it's good to see that this issue is at least being discussed in other
forums
even though those forums may be a little bit behind the time horizon
curve and not entirely open and transparent which is indicative of many
such "Blogs"...

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    Part 1.1   Type: Plain Text (text/plain)

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827