ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] FYI: First Four People Charged Under CAN-SPAM Act

  • To: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <ksmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] FYI: First Four People Charged Under CAN-SPAM Act
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 17:54:42 -0700
  • Cc: Don Evans <DEvans@xxxxxxx>, Paul Twomey <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>, james tierney <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

All, especially Leah and Jefsey,

"Four people in Detroit have been charged with [1]emailing fraudulent 
sales pitches under the new federal [2]CAN-SPAM Law. 'They were 
accused of disguising their identities in hundreds of thousands of 
sales pitches and delivering e-mails by bouncing messages
through unprotected relay computers on the Internet.'"

  Could old existing or no longer used List servers that remain with
open or unprotected relays also find the owners or list managers on 
the wrong end of a legal action and face some time at the "Rubber 
pancake Hotel"?

  Should past executives, like those from Telstra, Paul Twomey's old
employer and a prolific Spam originator be dragged into court by
stakeholders/users fed up with receiving spam from those ISP's,
and also spend some time at the "Rubber pancake Hotel"?

  It would seem the answer's here are Definitely YES according to
recent trends and the lack of reducing Spam...

  But than again DOJ and DOC/NTIA will sit on these growing
in number complaints, and these folks will get a pass...  ????

 I know one thing for sure, I am tired of getting these Kiddy porn
spam Emails from Telstra email users...  :/

1. http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/28/internet.spam.ap/index.html
2. http://www.spamlaws.com/federal/108s877.html


Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>