<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Replacements for VeriSign registry?
- To: "'George Kirikos'" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Replacements for VeriSign registry?
- From: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx (admin)
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:23:18 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20031212183720.21431.qmail@web14204.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The domain name database is small compared to these. I believe Tucows said
they could run the registry for about $2 per name instead of $6.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
George Kirikos
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:37 PM
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ga] Replacements for VeriSign registry?
Hello,
An interesting set of tables at:
http://www.wintercorp.com/vldb/2003_TopTen_Survey/TopTenWinners.asp
listing those managing large databases in the world. AT&T and
Amazon.com are up there in running huge databases.... (although, so is
France Telecom....).
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|