Re: [ga] ICANN Ombudsman??
- To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Ombudsman??
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 23:53:10 -0800
- Cc: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandy Harris <sandy@xxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <DHEIJCFHPEMGGMBMIIDAGEAIDDAA.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Michael and all former DNSO GA members or other stakeholders/users,
Listening is good, doing is better, and doing what the stakeholders/users
desire or want is what is necessary and is what a non-profit public
benefit corp. is supposed to do and in ICANN's case mandated to do.
It has failed to do so far too often and too egregiously/harmfully.
As such your brief evaluation of "I think things are heading in the
right direction.", defies reality...
Thank you for lending your ear and eyes in your "Listening" Michael.
I for one have taken note. The directors that may read ICANNWatch
doesn't seem to have been adequately impressionable upon them or
had the impression that was intended and needed...
> I am always listening :-)
> Although this email may get a "When Pigs Fly Icon" on ICANNWatch, I think
> things are heading in the right direction.
> In fact I was surprised by the number of directors that read ICANNWatch to
> hear what the people are saying. Although I may not always agree with you
> and the other GA members I am listening, because much like yourself I will
> be returning to my humble origins with the huddled masses in the not to
> distance future.
> Best regards,
> Michael D. Palage
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
> Of Karl Auerbach
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:49 PM
> To: Sandy Harris
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN Ombudsman??
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Sandy Harris wrote:
> > > I find it interesting that he said folks can go to an ICANN ombudsman.
> I found the ombudsman "reform" to be laughable.
> Every one of ICANN's directors has the power to be an ombudsman - in fact
> every one of ICANN's directors has not merely the irrevocable legal power,
> but also the fiduciary obligation to inquire into the proper operation of
> ICANN, the corporation.
> Unfortunately ICANN's directors, by and large, have been inexcusably
> passive with regard to their duties and to matters that protect the
> interests of the community of internet users.
> In any accountable organization, those for whose benefit the corporation
> exists - in ICANN's case this is "the public" - would have the power to
> elect a new, responsive board. A responsive board would obviate an
> ICANN's ombudsman is nothing but a fig leaf. It goes along with ICANN's
> other fig leaves - such as the fictional story that ICANN "oversees" the
> net when in fact it has no power over IP address allocations or the stable
> operation of any root server except IANA's.
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801