Re: [ga] ICANN Board postponing further sTLDs

[Don Brown <donbrown_l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your logic escapes me, and I suspect most of us.

Shed those rose colored glasses (break them).  Take a look at reality,
because reality is the way it is.

Almost everything is based upon revenue - I'm sorry to break the
that news to you, but that is really the way it is.

I grew up in the 60's; the flower power era.  However, I figured it out
all by myself.  Think about it.  There are motives that don't match
the way you think it should be . . .

Thanks,


Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 9:42:09 AM, J-F C. (Jefsey)  Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JFCJM> On 15:25 28/10/03, Don Brown said:
>>Who benefits economically from not launching additional TLDs. Follow the 
>>money . .

JFCJM> Yes?

JFCJM> the actual point is that there is _NO_money in names.
JFCJM> The money is in what people will accept you do with them.

JFCJM> The absudity is that ICANN wants to make believe shadows have a value (a 
JFCJM> name is an IP address shadow).

JFCJM> But never mind, the way IPv6.001 numbering scheme is designed ... it will 
JFCJM> need a UMS (unique machine system) copied on the DNS in order to know that 
JFCJM> 00100100010001000111000100101000100010001111000000000000001
JFCJM> is right now the same machine as:
JFCJM> 00110010111011001001000100010011111001110101011100111001000
JFCJM> just because they do not want to allocate one host sub-number by 
JFCJM> registrant. As if you had one different mobile ttelephone number per 
JFCJM> carrier you may use....

JFCJM> And wait for the application of IDNA and "internationalized" mail names.

JFCJM> Dont' be afraid the ICANN system is not ready to die. Plenty of occasions 
JFCJM> to make money with the wind.
JFCJM> jfc






----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx         http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55              (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----