<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Additional sources of revenue (Re: [ga] ALAC statement...)
- To: Joanna Lane <jo-uk@xxxxxxx>, Marc Schneiders <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Additional sources of revenue (Re: [ga] ALAC statement...)
- From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:18:51 -0700
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPAEAKEBAA.jo-uk@rcn.com>
- Organization: Alice's Registry, Inc.
- References: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPAEAKEBAA.jo-uk@rcn.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: KMail/1.5.3
If you didn't like siteFinder just wait till october when everyone gets to
purchase their domain again to protect a WLS position... And the wholesale
price is 400% more than the origional wholesale price of the working
registration.
registrants should be thinking of some kind of "class-action" as aparently
ICANN only listens to those that sue the organization.
-rick
On Thursday 18 September 2003 7:30 pm, Joanna Lane wrote:
> Marc Schneiders wrote:-
> <Maybe ICANN could make money from the wildcard TLD (* in the root zone)?>
>
> Logic dictates that it has a way to do that already. Not only does ICANN
> not do anything that is not in it's own interests of (ICANN interests in
> this instance being defined by special interests as opposed to the public
> interest ICANN was set up to promote), but also, it is inconceivable that
> Verisign could have implemented anything as radical as this without at
> least running it past ICANN's closed session executive branch. The question
> is how is ICANN benefiting? Has Verisign increased its commitment to ICANN
> commensurate with its increased gross revenue, or what?
>
> Joanna
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|