<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [Ecommerce] A few details of Microsoft's lobbying against WIPO event
- To: ecommerce <ecommerce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: [Ecommerce] A few details of Microsoft's lobbying against WIPO event
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 01:45:42 -0700
- Cc: Jeri Clausing <jeric@xxxxxxx>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <3F43FA95.6050803@cptech.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
James and all,
I am saddened to see that a once wonderful journalist has besmirched
journalism in acting in such capacity with BSA and BSA taking this
very questionable position. I hope that more of our members
will exercise appropriate input as they have been doing on this
very important and divisive issue.
James Love wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: A few details of Microsoft's lobbying against WIPO event
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:44:35 -0400
> From: James Love <james.love@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: random-bits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >From the TechDaily article, it appears as though WIPO had received a
> number of calls in opposition to the meeting on open collaborative
> efforts to create public goods. Microsoft has been I believe the main
> private sector actor in this (even though the request for the meeting
> was quite broader than free/open software). One group active in
> opposing the WIPO event was BSA, a group often run as if it is a
> subsidiary of Microsoft. BSA's Emory Simon was making calls and taking
> meetings with senior US government officials to oppose the meeting..
> Jeri Clausing, a former NYT reporter now working for BSA was calling
> reporters to tell them that WIPO had cancelled the meeting, and Jeri
> also told at least one reporter she had correspondence that WIPO had
> sent to me, which I found somewhat surprising. (In this case, just a
> letter that seemed like a standard acknowledgement of the request, that
> Jeri claimed was something more). According to Jeri (whom I called),
> Mario Correa from BSA was also working to block the WIPO meeting.
> Mario is the head of "software policy" for BSA. Mario has been active
> in opposing government proposals to require open source software
> procruement (see below). Another Micosoft agent who appears to have
> been instrumental in raising the spector of that open/free software was
> a violation of the GATT was long time Micorosoft defender Jonathan
> Zuck. Zuck's group ACT (web page doesn't work well with Mozilla, so
> use MS's EI) features an article by former USPTO and WIPO offical and
> recent big pharma lobbyist Dick Wilder about the "lessons the Open
> Source community can learn from the SCO/IBM lawsuit." Act has opposed
> goverment rules to favor open source software development and also
> claims such rules are a GATT violation. jamie
>
> http://global.bsa.org/usa/press/newsreleases/2003-06-12.1653.phtml
> BSA Testimony on Federal Policy and Open Source Software before the
> Center for Strategic and International Studies
> Prepared Remarks of Mario Correa
> Director of Software Policy
> Business Software Alliance (BSA)
>
> Before the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
> Federal Policy and Open Source Software
>
> June 12, 2003
>
> --
> James Love, Director, Consumer Project on Technology
> http://www.cptech.org, mailto:james.love@xxxxxxxxxx
> tel. +1.202.387.8030, mobile +1.202.361.3040
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecommerce mailing list
> Ecommerce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/ecommerce
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|