Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...

[Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Eric Dierker wrote:
> 
>> Seperation sounds great Karl but that ain't in the green and white
>> papers.
> 
> The green and white papers are not binding.  If they were, ICANN would
> be obligated to have a real public component.
> 
>Karl, if representaions to the IRS, and department of commerce and the 
California Secratary of State and DBAs are not binding then just go ahead 
and throw out all BTAs, NAFTA and the EU. (oh don't forget the UN and Nato)
Papers which convince another entity to do business with you and especially 
those of international importance are binding and deviations therefrom with 
intent to profit are extremely wrongful.

ICANN is obligated to have a real public component and you know it.

Eric