<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Verisign under penalty of perjury: without WLS, registrars 'threaten the stability of the Internet'
- To: ali@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Verisign under penalty of perjury: without WLS, registrars 'threaten the stability of the Internet'
- From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
- In-reply-to: <3F3022A5.FAA2CD94@ix.netcom.com>
- References: <3F3022A5.FAA2CD94@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bravo!!
Well done and thanks from our dotcommoners.
e
> Ali Farshchian wrote:
>
>> |ICANN's unlikely to respond, as they'll say "we're in the middle of a
>> |lawsuit". They didn't have that argument last year, but ignored the
>> |questions then too. Maybe one of the registrars will like to take a
>> |stab at it, on their mailing list. Or, perhaps someone in the press
>> |will get Mary Hewitt, who always seems to have an answer, to explain
>> |things.
>>
>> We've been successful at raising attention regarding these issues here
>> primarily due to collective participation of the Internet community:
>> http://www.circleid.com/wls (still on going...)
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|