[ga] Re: FC: Should we care about what happens to expiring dot.com domains?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Declan, Ali and all,

  Yes the WLS controversy is still ongoing with several new
legal actions filed.  As one of the participants in the ICANN
run "Comment period" held by the DNSO/GNSO of ICANN,
it is clear that the ICANN BoD and in particular theICANN
Staff did not take the predominance of those requested
comments into very much consideration.

Declan McCullagh wrote:

> ---
>
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:49:18 -0700
> From: Ali Farshchian <ali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Just how big is the Domain Name WLS Controversy?
> To: declan@xxxxxxxx
>
> Declan,
>
> CircleID has done a special coverage of Wait Listing Service (WLS)
> Controversy over Domain Names involving ICANN and VeriSign -- we have been
> gathering some facts and industry commentary which might be of interest to
> you and Politech readers.
>
> Just how big is the Domain Name WLS Controversy?
> Here are some hints...
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Facts & Figures:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> - About 25,000 domain names are deleted each day
> - Roughly 80 to 100 million inquiries are made per day in order to snatch
> deleted .com/.net domains
> - Around 40% of registered domain names are deleted each year
> - Total number of .com/.net domains registered is approximately 26,500,000
> - A 5-year WLS contract is estimated to generate $100 to $150 million for
> the service provider (does not include registry revenues).
> - WLS is scheduled to launch on Oct. 11, 2003
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Industry Commentary
> Source: http://www.circleid.com
> -------------------------------------------------------
> - Elana Broitman, Director of Policy, Register.com:
> "We are concerned about some of the conditions currently being considered by
> ICANN - primarily, the 'black out period' ...We consider this a condition
> that could confuse consumers and dampen domain name competition."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/180_0_1_0_C/
>
> - Elliot Noss, President & CEO, Tucows Inc:
> "Verisign is paid a sum of money to perform a service. They own neither the
> primary nor the secondary data ...The implication of this conclusion as it
> relates to WLS is that any re-registration market service is outside the
> scope of the original contract and should be treated as any new service
> should."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/175_0_1_0_C/
>
> - Michael Mann, President of BuyDomains.com:
> "Also disturbing is that the WLS ultimately proposes selling an option on
> someone else's property -- there is oftentimes no service even performed if
> the name is renewed by its owner."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/182_0_1_0_C/
>
> - Mason Cole, VP Marketing & Corporate Communications, SnapNames, Inc:
> "Why the WLS is Better for Consumers...Today's makeshift system for domain
> name reservations -- comprised of dozens of providers trying to get names
> the very moment they become available again -- gives customers value, but
> it's still very hard to reserve and secure a name."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/181_0_1_0_C/
>
> - Mark Jeftovic, President & Co-Founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc:
> "Verisign's implementation of WLS looks a lot like an abuse of monopoly
> power: the creation of a "digital derivative" instrument sold at a 400%
> markup over the underlying asset, while locking out any competition in the
> process."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/176_0_1_0_C/
>
> - Jay Westerdal, President, Name Intelligence:
> "A more perfect solution to the problem might be...people could register
> '.comfailsafe', a domain that would not resolve on the Internet...Verisign
> has proven they can run a registry, so why not just propose a shadow
> registry with all the rules of a regular registry. Everything from transfers
> to WIPO."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/196_0_1_0_C/
>
> - Roger Collins, President, Afternic.com:
> "A positive consequence of this debate is that domain name owners will gain
> knowledge about the value of their domains."
> http://www.circleid.com/article/177_0_1_0_C/
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Public Opinion
> -------------------------------------------------------
> - Further comments are also submitted here:
> http://www.circleid.com/article/166_0_1_0_C/
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
> You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
> This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
> Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801