[ga] ICANN's "fuzzy math" when it comes to hours of work

[George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi folks,

I read with amusement ICANN's latest PR that Michael Salazar had resigned, but 
that Kurt Pritz would be taking on his duties, in addition to his existing ones.

http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-21jun12-en.htm


However, pages 58 and 59 of the latest IRS Form 990 (for the period ending June 
30, 2011) *claimed* that both Kurt Pritz and Michael Salazar were already each 
working 60 hours/week:

http://www.icann.org/en/about/financials/tax/us/fy-2011-form-990-en.pdf

So, how does ICANN, with a straight face, say to the world that Kurt Pritz will 
now be working 120 hours/week? Or is it possible that ICANN had erred in its 
Form 990, and that the true hours of work are significantly less than 60 
hours/week? 


Maybe ICANN should get Compass Lexecon to do an "economic study" of this issue, 
gratis -- the ICANN community certainly didn't benefit much from the $623,735 
wasted on them in that year.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.leap.com/