Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas and all,

  Thanks for the update.  Good work BTW Thomas!  Perhaps in the near term future
ICANN could put somebody on keeping a closer eye on list performance?  Just
a thought.

Kindest regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 4/18/12
CISO
Phone: 214-245-2647

On 4/24/12, Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I suspect those counts are "accurate" under ICANN's method of
>>  counting -- namely that only input by ICANN insiders (like Thomas
>>  Narten, a Board member) get counted.
>
> Maybe you're on to something.
>
> Or not.
>
> Counts were off last week when I made an unrelated change to my
> procmail files and all my mail logging stuff stopped working. Took
> several days before I noticed. Same count discrepencies occurred on
> the other lists I send out weekly stats on.
>
> Thomas
>
>> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg04583.html
>
>
>> That's the identical methodology used when counting a "consensus"
>>  for things like new gTLDs.
>
>> Sincerely,
>
>> George Kirikos
>> http://www.leap.com/
>
>