<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] user security
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] user security
- From: Matthew Pemble <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:53:24 +0100
On 21 April 2012 13:15, Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Recent in depth review an research conducted by my organization and two
> others has yet again
> revealed
>
Is this published research? Or are we expected to take your word for it?
> that many frequently accessed websites/domains remain entirely or
> significantly insecure
>
What do you mean by that? "Insecure" is a rather broad sweep across a wide
range of technical and procedural areas.
And, then, "entirely insecure" is a very strong statement from you, without
any justification presented.
> and therefore unsafe as unsuspecting users are unsuspectingly exposed to
> potential and various
> sorts of harm.
>
And the conclusion is weak because the assumptions, findings, whatever are
not only unjustified but actually undocumented.
> This study and subsequent report has been requested by various and
> numerous
> private sector and public sector parties for reference ect. purposes.
>
That would be nice.
M.
--
Matthew Pemble
Technical Director, Idrach Ltd
Mobile: +44 (0) 7595 652175
Office: + 44 (0) 1324 820690
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|