Re: [ga] Weekly posting summary for ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx>]

George and all,

  Thank you George for the clarification.  Certainly this is one
explanation or rational.  A newly coined
math, eh?  ICANN math anyone?  Maybe ICANN or the GNSO at least someday
will launch it's very own Satellite
from North Korea?  Maybe it will be dubbed + or - consensus?  [?] . Or
'Enhanced consensus'?

  Its a brave new world!

Kindest regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Ph # 214-245-2647

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:06 PM, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> I suspect those counts are "accurate" under ICANN's method of counting --
> namely that only input by ICANN insiders (like Thomas Narten, a Board
> member) get counted.
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga-200709/msg04583.html
>
>
> That's the identical methodology used when counting a "consensus" for
> things like new gTLDs.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.leap.com/
>