Re: [ga] Re: Most Popular Invalid TLDs Should Be Reserved
- To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>, George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Most Popular Invalid TLDs Should Be Reserved
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:09:49 -0800 (PST)
I found this interchange disturbing. It seems self serving and innacurate all
the way around. This issue was often discussed here way back when. Seems almost
like two guys agreeing to publicly go out an mutually toot each others horn.
a pretty picture.
But as always we can credit George with bringing pressure to ICANN, and we can
count on ICANN to look alarmed and then show off what they accomplished, even
though too little too late.
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
To: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: GNSO GA Mailing List <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, November 19, 2010 7:19:51 AM
Subject: [ga] Re: Most Popular Invalid TLDs Should Be Reserved
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:50:52AM -0800,
George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 53 lines which said:
> I find it odd, though, that my name and work went unacknowledged in
> ICANN's report,
This issue have been known and discussed for many years (root name
server operators read the traffic...) and I find your remark extremely
petty (but quite in line with the current state of the Internet
governance, where only lawyers and trolls are left alive).