[ga] Bridging the gap: why privacy and security are so important IV - Chrome Private Mode Not Quite Private

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

  Seems that Google hasn't yet gotten the message.  But it also
seems that it is being given to them loud and clear.  Hopefully
they will comply sooner rather than later.  The handwriting is,
if I may paraphrase, is all over the Internet!  Perhaps Vint
can get his much vaunted "Evangalistic" talents in high gear soon
or is Google a anti-privacy proponent?  If the latter, it's clear
that that paradigm is loosing followers in droves...

See: 
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/05/18/1523250/Chrome-Private-Mode-Not-Quite-Private
"Google Chrome appears to store at least some information
related to, and including, the sites that you have visited when browsing
in Incognito mode. Lewis Thompson outlines 
http://www.lewiz.org/2010/05/chrome-incognito-tracks-visited-sites.html
a set of steps you can follow to confirm whether you are affected. 
He has apparently reported this to Google, but no response has yet been 
received."

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders and growing, 
strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827