ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Implications for Whois?: Draft Data Protection Legislation in US House

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx, jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx, baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Implications for Whois?: Draft Data Protection Legislation in US House
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:27:46 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

All,

  Adding Dr. Joe so that he isn't left out...

  Are there implications for Whois here?  Seems to me that
there are several...  There are also several parts that do
not or would not effect Whois obviously...  Of course ICANN
could have addressed this difinitively long ago now and set a
president, but didn't and thus punted leaving it now to governments
to make such decisions as a part of adult intervention as it were.
We all may regret same, or at least half of us will.  If to err,
I would err on the side of respecting personal privacy.  I am sure
others will of course very and/or strongly disagree accordingly.

See:
(May 4 & 5, 2010)
Draft data privacy legislation introduced by US lawmakers would restrict
the way organizations can gather, retain and use personal information
they collect from customers.  The draft draws a distinction between
covered information, which is opt-out, and sensitive information, which
is opt-in.  Covered information would include names, street addresses,
phone numbers, email addresses and government issued identification
numbers, including Social Security numbers (SSNs).  Sensitive
information includes medical records, race and ethnicity, sexual
orientation, financial records and geolocation data. The proposal has
met with criticism for "codify[ing] current online privacy practices
that exist more for the benefit of companies than customers."  The
proposed legislation is meeting with criticism from both sides.
Consumer rights advocates say it does not go far enough, and businesses
say it goes too far.
http://fcw.com/articles/2010/05/04/web-consumer-privacy-bill.aspx?admgarea=TC_SECCYBERSEC
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/religion-sex-money-location-bill-makes-them-sensitive-info.ars
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9176311/Lawmakers_unveil_online_privacy_bill?taxonomyId=84
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/05/us_privacy_bill/
http://www.scmagazineus.com/congressmen-propose-draft-online-privacy-bill/article/169522/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20004165-38.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders and growing, 
strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>