<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Contributions
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Contributions
- From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 14:31:28 -0400
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do believe this is unsung work and deserves some recognition. I am
> thinking of establishing an award in your name. I am very serious.
>
I agree.
> Narten has helped us greatly with the statistics that he claims are no big
> deal.
>
That is a big help in establishing mandated participation in accordance with
the rules.
> No one can deny Kirokis' contributions
>
yes he's a good agitator too ..
> We have benefited greatly from Danny, Roberto, Karl and Avri. The list goes
> on.
>
and let's not forget !Dr. Debbie.
> Joe and Jeff while controversial have kept us alive in times of innactivity
> and the constant bringing to light is good for all.
>
shock treatment.
>
> Perhaps it is time we begin to honor these contributions and toot our own
> horn a bit.
>
We are a fantastic group of people. The only place where everything ICANN
comes to roost. We are also the oldest ICANN list in existence. I think it's
time ICANN gave us back our vote and our voice. Let us evolve and replace
ICANN.
cheers
joe baptista
>
> --- On *Sat, 5/1/10, Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ga] Godaddy mail hostname = spam errors and possible security
> issue?
> To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, May 1, 2010, 9:02 AM
>
>
>
> Mail from a Registrar to a Registrant, rejected due to errors in the
> Registrar's mail system is "tough luck" and not a potential security problem
> for Registrants?
>
> And a Registrar spoofiing someone else's hostname is cool with you guys?
>
> Sheesh.
>
>
> On May 1, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > So this sure looks like an error without a problem.
> >
> > --- On Fri, 4/30/10, Hugo Monteiro
> > <hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Hugo Monteiro
> > <hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Godaddy mail hostname = spam errors and possible
> security issue?
> > To: "Andy Gardner"
> > <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Cc:
> > "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> > GA" <
> ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Date: Friday, April 30, 2010, 3:25 PM
> >
> > On 04/30/2010 10:04 PM, Andy Gardner wrote:
> >> Godaddy appears to use "made up" hostnames for SMTP HELO entries...
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Hello Andy,
> >
> > That is in fact a shame, since the sending hostname DOES have a proper
> DNS setup. Even so, RFC5321 does not mandate that the correct HELO is to be
> provided. From section 4.1.1.1 we can extract:
> >
> > "(...) The argument clause contains the fully-qualified domain name of
> the SMTP client, if one is available. In situations in which the SMTP client
> system does not have a meaningful domain name (e.g., when its address is
> dynamically allocated and no reverse mapping record is available), the
> client SHOULD send an address literal (...)"
> >
> >
> >> Received: from unknown (HELO gdmailer03.dc1.corp.gd)
> (208.109.14.188) by m1relayapp01-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP
> >>
> >> I can see a couple of problems with this.
> >>
> >> 1. Many antiSPAM measure reject mail from unknown hosts.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > True, but that's actually their own problem. If their mail gets rejected,
> tough luck.
> >
> >
> >> 2. corp.gd is a legitimate domain name owned by someone else than than
> Godaddy.
> >>
> >> Domain Name: corp.gd
> >>
> >> Registrant, Technical Contact, Billing Contact, Admin. Contact
> >> SRA, MII
> >> Private Registration, b-dul Unirii 80, Bacau, , , ,
> >> ramsmith59@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ramsmith59@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Romania
> >> E-mail:
> >> domainmailfwd@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=domainmailfwd@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Phone: 1.44.7833722420
> >> Fax: 1.40.72729289
> >>
> >> Resource Records (2):
> >> ns ns1.register.com
> >> ns ns2.register.com
> >>
> >>
> >> One wonders how a major ICANN approved registrar can make such basic
> technical errors, and leave them in place for YEARS?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > One possibility is that they have contracted a mailing service from a
> company (corp.gd), which happens to be Godaddy client for a conectivity
> package, in Godaddys own ip netblock.
> >
> >
> > R's,
> >
> > Hugo Monteiro.
> > --
> > fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature
> >
> > Hugo Monteiro
> > Email :
> > hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
> > Web :
> > http://hmonteiro.net
> >
> >
> > Divisão de Informática
> > Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
> > Universidade Nova de Lisboa
> > Quinta da Torre 2829-516 Caparica Portugal
> > Telefone: +351 212948596 Fax: +351 212948548
> >
> > www.fct.unl.pt
> > apoio@xxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=apoio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > fct.unl.pt:~# _
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Joe Baptista
www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative &
Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
Personal: http://baptista.cynikal.net/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|