Re: [ga] Re: Resolving the Inclusives

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Gentlemen,
 
I investigate for one mere and sole purpose - to move forward.  The wrongs of 
the past are indeed interesting and by short study we can see cause of failure. 
But in general the past in this scenario tells us a very simple truth. 
 
It is strange how so human a trait and so obviously a sometimes negative trait 
can change the entire course of a given history. We can all see what a great 
Utopia pure communism can be, but we have read Animal Farm and can see the 
falacy of the human condition known as Ego. We all have one, the difference is 
that some control it and others are controlled by it. 

--- On Fri, 4/23/10, Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec
To: "John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, April 23, 2010, 7:39 AM


John:

Hugh knows how to investigate. He's not going to pay much attention to your 
babble. He's interested in the hard facts. Like why did Martijn Burger write 
this letter? http://bit.ly/a0hTZ4 Is he lying too - or why is a student 
committing fraud against his school? http://bit.ly/7It7ej Is the principle 
lying too? And what of the criminal and commercial fraud perpetuated by you and 
your colleagues at the TLDA against Henk Smit and Eric MacIver ... a former TLD 
member.

These are the issues Hugh will deal with - not the false libelous accusations 
you craft here.

As for your "threats" to follow me to the ends of twitter and facebook - I 
accept your challenge. I see these "threats" more as "opportunities" to spread 
the word. People on facebook and twitter have accessed you as my personal 
Internet stalker which makes me a bit of a celebrity. To your benefit your 
twitter page shows http://bit.ly/91lovb me you have a total of 28 followers. 
Thats one more follower then you had last week - and I take credit for that. 
Also I have you libeling and slandering me in multiple languages - which I 
think is novel.

I know how to use an obsessed personality. Follow away.

cheers
joe baptista

 


On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:34 AM, John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:



Hugh - I hope you undertsand by now that none of Joe's claims about criminality 
and fraud in 
Europe have been proven true, in fact, evidence is that he was the only one who 
committed any
kind of offense (stealing a bike).
 
All of Joe's "evidence" is just his own writings on his silly little website 
that he crafts in a way to 
make them look like news articles that he has pinched from somewhere else. The 
casual (read: lazy)
observer visiting his website will be fooled into thinking that they are 
authoritative. They are not.
 
I have investigated his latest scam - the Gymnasium Querfurt incident and the 
results show that he
pounced on more innocent victims in his mad vendetta against Herman Xennt and 
his group. The
results of my investigation are here:
 
http://lair.lionpost.net/pipermail/baptista-offenses/2010-April/000021.html
 
He dragged an innocent high school student into his swirling pit of psychosis 
and annoyed the principal of
a top school in Germany by pretending to be someone of knowledge and authority, 
which  he is most 
certainly IS NOT.
 
If you want an accurate depiction of what Joe did in Holland in 2005 - the 
damage he caused - see
here for the real story:
 
http://inaic.com/index.php?p=internet-terror
Now Joe, if you want me to stop following you around to correct your lies, 
misrepresentations, half truths and paranoid
ravings, you need to be quiet:You will NEVER AGAIN call Herman or the people in 
Europe crooks, refer to their businesses and crooked, tell the lie that they

are criminals, tax cheats or other vile things WHICH THEY ARE NOT.You will 
NEVER, EVER again call anyone a "welfare bum" or insult members of their family 
or discuss those members on

a public list without the person's permission.You will NEVER again claim that 
you in any way have any authority in the TLDA or that you are even a member or 
have

any right to tell the organization how to conduct its business. You will NEVER 
EVER engage in any other slander or other bad behavior in the inclusive 
namespace. You will NEVER EVER EVER

again seek to destroy or disrupt any registry, registrar, TLD reseller, root 
operator or other DNS professional in the Inclusive Namespace.You will avoid 
causing any other trouble to this industry or any other industry or cause that 
is important to me and the others

with which  I associate.If you continue to violate these rules, I will follow 
you around and pummel you into dust each and every time you open your filthy, 
slanderous and psychotic mouth so that the poor listeners can be given the 
truth about you and your destructive lies. This is a page I

am taking out of Tom Evan's book. GOT THAT, JOE.Cheers,
John----- Original Message ----- 




From: Hugh Dierker 
To: cet1@xxxxxxxxx ; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA ; Joe Baptista 
Cc: Paul Wouters ; Bind Users Mailing List ; Timothe Litt 
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec






Fair trade is necessary trade. Unnecessary tradeoffs are lame. These problems 
are not necessary -- except that they are within the given framework of lack of 
motivation to do better.  It comes down to this, if we set our standards 
outside of competitive models there is no incentive to do better.  ICANN, the 
Dnssec and this SAIC are working within government sanctioned slobbery, 
both intellectual and economic slobbery.  I used to think it was snobbery, now 
I know it is a laziness born of shovel leaning bureaucrats. You may be kind and 
call it "make work" but would you call intentional fraud "make work"? Buggy 
whips and Railroad fireman is what this is.
 
The plan I am putting together for the inculsives will generate some new fire 
under the pants of these obstructionists and they will find that a better 
mousetrap can be built.
 


--- On Thu, 4/22/10, Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] Re: Resolving .gov w/dnssec
To: cet1@xxxxxxxxx, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Paul Wouters" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bind Users Mailing List" 
<bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Timothe Litt" <litt@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010, 8:07 AM


Looks like the future of the DNSSEC make work project includes resolution 
failures here and there. More security - less stability - guaranteed slavery. I 
wounder if it's a fair trade.

we'll see ..
regards
joe baptista


On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Chris Thompson <cet1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Apr 22 2010, Paul Wouters wrote:


On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Timothe Litt wrote:


I'm having trouble resolving uspto.gov with bind 9.6.1-P3 and 9.6-ESV
configured as valdidating resolvers.

Using dig, I get a connection timeout error after a long (~10 sec) delay.
+cdflag provides an immediate response.


Is anyone else seeing this?  Ideas on how to troubleshoot?

I have the same problems with our validating unbound instance. 

I suspect that this has to do with

 dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @dns1.uspto.gov.
 dig +dnssec +norec dnskey uspto.gov @sns2.uspto.gov.

failing with timeouts, while   dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov 
@dns1.uspto.gov.
 dig +dnssec +norec +vc dnskey uspto.gov @dns2.uspto.gov.

work fine ... with a 1736-byte answer. Probably the fragmented
UDP response is getting lost somewhere near the authoritative
servers themselves.

-- 
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1@xxxxxxxxx 




_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users