<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: Update
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:50:58 +0100
Ok, thanks Danny.
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:13 PM
To: Hugh Dierker; Dominik Filipp
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
Dominik,
I received no formal response, only a note that the letter had been
distributed to the entire board (as opposed to only to the Structural
Improvements Committee).
-- Danny --
--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Update
> To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hugh Dierker"
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 9:05 AM
> Danny,
>
> Was there any response on the letter as it is dated about
> two months
> ago?
>
> Dominik
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf
> Of Danny Younger
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 2:40 PM
> To: Hugh Dierker
> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ga] Re: Update
>
> Eric,
>
> Please take note of the attached correspondence that was
> earlier
> submitted to the Board's Structural Improvements Committee
> -- it should
> answer some of your questions.
>
> -- Danny --
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|