<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] new gTLDs: ICANN seeks input and advice - REGISTRANTS
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Accountability Headquarters <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] new gTLDs: ICANN seeks input and advice - REGISTRANTS
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:50:04 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Eric and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> ICANN has made it relitively clear that it doesn't want open and
transparent Independant</P>
<P>Registrants grouping together in any form of officially recognized body by
ICANN.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> For my money the GA is still the best place for what you suggest to
take place</P>
<P>and needs to be reinstated as an official body within the ICANN structure
accordingly.</P>
<P>This is of course unlikely to occur, and a shame that such is likely the
case.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> Instead we are all spoon-fed the questions that ICANN feels are
relevant to what</P>
<P>they wish to know and perhaps pater project in future policy and/or
practice. That is</P>
<P>not what ICANN was formed/created for. <BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker
<HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Nov 11, 2009 11:35 PM <BR>To: Accountability
Headquarters <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re: [ga] new gTLDs: ICANN seeks
input and advice - REGISTRANTS <BR><BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>This call for input is exactly the kind of input that we would all benefit
if the Registrants were organized into a body politic and societe that could
provide open discussion and debate. If they could garner themselves into
a process that could produce viable major and minor consensus reports they
could aid the consumer. If they were open and transparent and adopted
cooperations models that allowed for variable suggestions they could impact the
way things are done.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR>You can access this Expressions of Interest Public Comment Forum
here:<BR><A
href="http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200912.htm#eoi-new-gtlds";
target=_blank>http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200912.htm#eoi-new-gtlds</A><BR><BR>Comments
may:<BR><BR>.propose EOI models, and<BR>.offer support or criticism for the
concept overall.<BR>The most helpful comments will provide rationale along with
opinions on the following issues:<BR><BR>1.How do we ensure that participation
in the EOI accurately represents the level of interest?<BR><BR><BR>2.Should
only those who participate in the EOI be eligible to participate in the first
round when the program officially launches?<BR><BR><BR>3.Should a deposit be
required for participation in the EOI?<BR><BR><BR>4.If there is a fee, under
what circumstances should there be refund?<BR><BR><BR>5.What information should
be collected from EOI participants?<BR>5.1 What subset of applicant
questions found in the Applicant Guidebook at <A
href="http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-evaluation-criteria-clean-04oct09-en.pdf";
target=_blank>http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-evaluation-criteria-clean-04oct09-en.pdf</A>
should be answered?<BR><BR><BR>5.2 Including applied-for
strings?<BR><BR><BR>5.3 Should information be made public?<BR>6.Must the
responder commit to go live within a certain time of
delegation?<BR><BR><BR>7.What are the implications for potential changes to the
Applicant Guidebook after the EOI participation period
closes?<BR><BR><BR>8.What are the potential risks associated with the
EOI?<BR>Related Resources: <BR><BR>For Program details, go to: <A
href="http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm";
target=_blank>http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm</A><BR><BR>Glen
de Saint Géry<BR>GNSO Secretariat<BR><A
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
ymailto="mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><A
href="http://gnso.icann.org/";
target=_blank>http://gnso.icann.org</A><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey
A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders
strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>
Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not
with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore
Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll
Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827<BR></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|