<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] UPDATE DARPA wants military to replace TCP/IP with new "Military Network Protocol"
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx, rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] UPDATE DARPA wants military to replace TCP/IP with new "Military Network Protocol"
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:35:23 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Eric and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> My response remarks are interspersed below..<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker
<HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Oct 17, 2009 9:25 PM <BR>To: Joe Baptista
<BAPTISTA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Cc: Accountability Headquarters
<GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: Re: [ga] UPDATE DARPA wants military to replace
TCP/IP with new "Military Network Protocol" <BR><BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>This line is the one that got me -- <BR><BR>--- On <B>Fri, 10/16/09, Joe
Baptista <I><baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR>David Reed a computer scientist who was heavily involved in the early
development of TCP/IP knowns something about MNP and thinks the project is
"highly confused in its goals". However according Reed "there is no way
to advise these guys". <BR><BR>"The core idea", says Reed, "seems to be that if
you are incompatible with the Internet, you can be secure". Reed said the
justification for MNP reminds him of the <STRONG>days when countries justified
having different railroad gauges to prevent invasion.</STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV>Ov'r ta the IGF they are currently herding newbies into "Ralos". How
obviously meant to divide up people with commonalities into groups that cannot
reach agreement. (perhaps that is the pentagons idea eh?) Think of ASEAN
{{Association of SouthEast Asian Nations}} Their official language is English.
You tell me if a Mekong fish farmer has more in common with a Norwegian Herring
fisherman or a Thai Monk Professor at University of Thailand. Changing gauges
at the border hmm seems designed to segregate folks -- make sure that the two
potatoe farmers along the DMZ of the Koreas have less in common.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>What is north America's Ralo -- Francais, English, Spanish? In my hood it
would need Farsi and Vietnamese. But I grew up climbing trees, running
rivers and climbing mountains I sure do not have anything in common with a
Chicago boy named Obama.. Why must I be in the same Ralo? I have a lot
more in common with a Mongolian horseman.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Good point here, seems that Portuguise was also left out as well as
several dialicts of Chinese. The RALO</DIV>
<DIV>concept is far from perfict or even adaquate, perhaps someday in the far
flung future it shall be. In my</DIV>
<DIV>immediate area there are Internet users and registrants with cultural ties
to more than 40 different</DIV>
<DIV>and distinct language and national origins. What RALO do they belong
to or should belong to?</DIV>
<DIV>What RALO would those with dual citizenship belong to? Well seems to
me that is difficult to </DIV>
<DIV>specifically decern, although if they reside in the USA they most likely
would be default grouped</DIV>
<DIV>into the NARALO wheather or not that is their preference or is in total,
appropriate for them</DIV>
<DIV>from their point or points of view. Perhaps Denise or Roberto can
give us all some advise</DIV>
<DIV>in this respect? Denise? Roberto?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> Eric you self determined commonality with "Mongolian Hoursman" is
interesting to say the</DIV>
<DIV>least, as to my knowledge there are few if any Mongolian breed hourses in
California or</DIV>
<DIV>anywhere else in the good ole US of A! >:) Personally I prefer an
american breed of </DIV>
<DIV>steed for reasons of endurance, agility and speed. None the less
your point is not missed</DIV>
<DIV>by me...</DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><BR></STRONG><BR>Read more on MNP ... <A
href="http://bit.ly/4BGiP2"; target=_blank
rel=nofollow>http://bit.ly/4BGiP2</A><BR><BR></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><BR> </P>
<P>Regards,<BR><BR><BR><BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. -
(Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the
greatest freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go
with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of
glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury,
L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L
multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v.
Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827<BR></P></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|