Re: [ga] .xxx IRP documents posted

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

And ICM thinks they are going to prevail.  Yikes!!  When the parties leading 
expert resorts to preaching and pontithicating and repeatedly using the word 
"should" and does not render any credentials regarding arbitration, judicial 
mediation or experience in conflict resolution that would signal to most a very 
weak case. But most important is the total lack of presentation regarding 
arbitrary and capricious denial.  In fact it would appear ICM supplied the IRP 
with good reason for ICANN's decision.
 
I am not pleased at all with the conduct of either party -- but I know a weak 
legal and negotiating hand when I see it.  Some might argue that the reason 
ICANN can do what they do, is that no one seems really motivated to put 
together a good legal team against them.  It would appear that the same puffer 
fish that hold the IP bar together had a hand in this failure.
--- On Wed, 10/14/09, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] .xxx IRP documents posted
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:49 AM







http://www.icmregistry.com/irp.html
 
The post-hearing submissions/documents in the .xxx case are now on-line.