[ga] Fw: ICANN News Alert -- Three Registrars Lose Accreditation
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Fw: ICANN News Alert -- Three Registrars Lose Accreditation
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
I do not think this is enough. It is not a matter of the 3. It is a matter of
"Complex Systems". In a natural business cycling sense we should see more
failure. A system that is truly open and free should see more risk and more
loss. On the one hand this minimal closure rate indicates not enough trying.
Therefore not enough incentive to risk the cost of participation. OTOH it
indicates a lack of competitiveness involving winners and losers.
How many tries for the lightbulb? What was each try? We cannot possibly be
trying hard enough to find the best business models if we are not in the
process of eliminating those that do not work.
I was very heartened to read of the Press Release regarding the Twin Cities
Sero grand predictions for a fairly new concept .Artist which will at least
strive to be a community networking inter and intra community networking
concept. I was likewise very pleased to see some momentum going for .gay. I
was quite bummed out to see both of them fall prey to fairly typical "Press
Release" for an "offereing" stylized announcements and suggesting rather
typical business models. They seem to stand out in concept but are rather dull
in inventiveness for people to invest of themselves into the origin of the
When I am so blessed to be able to teach marketing and business in rather
socialist -Mexico and rather communist-Vietnam the first lessons that I pound
into the skulls of mush is the Right to Fail. ICANN is not promoting this
concept. They somehow tie in the concept of "failure of the system" which is
quite a bogeyman in engineering, to the business model where the right to fail
is paramount to invention, innovation, synergy and evolution of our kind.
Everyday I scan my Spam for the failures. I read a few and then I pause and try
to think what I could learn from each one -- what not to do - what fire not to
stick my hand in - and then I give thanks for those who try.
(dictated not read ;-}
Eric Hugh Dierker
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, ICANN News Alert <communications@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: ICANN News Alert <communications@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Three Registrars Lose Accreditation
Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 3:32 PM
ICANN News Alert
Three Registrars Lose Accreditation
10 August 2009
Three registrars have lost their accreditation.
South America Domains Ltd doing business as namefrog.com, Simply Named Inc
(SimplyNamed.com) and Tahoe Domains Inc have not had their Registrar
Accreditation Agreement (RAA) renewed upon expiration for failure to comply
with the requirements of the RAA.
Letters have been sent to each registrar outlining the decision and reason
behind the decision.
Letter to South American Domains
Letter to Simply Named
Letter to Tahoe Domains
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/burnette-to-ball-30jul09-en.pdf [PDF, 229K]
Sign up for ICANN's Monthly Magazine http://www.icann.org/magazine/
This message was sent by: ICANN, 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
, Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6601
Email Marketing by iContact: http://freetrial.icontact.com
Manage your subscription: