Re: [ga] Question to ICANN Staff

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe they need credit card information for renewals....  That's at  
least one reasonable interpretation of "billing information."
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:

> Danny
>
> Maybe Maxim weren't depositing the data?
>
> Michele
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://mneylon.tel/
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business  
> Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> ________________________________________
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of  
> Danny Younger [dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 16 July 2009 18:50
> To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ga] Question to ICANN Staff
>
> In the ICANN Announcement regarding the Bulk Transfer of Maxim  
> Internet Domains to NameScout, this question is posed and answered:
> Q. Why do former Maxim Internet customers need to contact NameScout?
>
> A. Maxim Internet did not forward billing information to  
> NameScout.   Accordingly, all registrants must provide updated  
> billing information or transfer their names to other registrars.
> I fail to comprehend why registrants must proactively make such  
> contact when ICANN has in place Registrar Data Escrow Specifications  
> that require:
> (1.2.7) "The name and (where available) postal address, e-mail  
> address, voice telephone number, and fax number of the billing  
> contact."
> (See http://www.icann.org/en/rde/rde-specs-09nov07.pdf)
>
> Why isn't the escrowed data being used?