Re: [ga] Legal Changes in GNSO (resend)
- To: Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Legal Changes in GNSO (resend)
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:43:07 +1000
I believe it is possible that you misread the quote:
It was that those changes that legal counsel made to the document,
that were purely cosmetic, e.g. commas, spelling corrections,
numbering, expanding Nomcom to Nominating Committee, should just be
added in this reposting:
Also I might add that this was a review we had requested on changes we
were considering as recommendations to the Board. The reason we asked
for the review was to insure that our requested changes were within
the law as understood by ICANN's Legal counsel.
On 23 Jun 2009, at 04:31, Hugh Dierker wrote:
Just so that everyone gets a real clear picture of the GNSO's high
regard for doing things legally. This just in on the transcripts
>>AVRI DORIA: One thing I'll recommend before we see that up there
is that any of their changes, the legal changes that were essentially
cosmetic, should just be approved, and that we not worry about
Wow. I think it is great that ICANN thinks that operating within the
law is purely cosmetic.
I sure hope they do not take off their makeup, so we can see what
they are really doing.