ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Public Comment: Single and Two-Character .BIZ Domains

  • To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Public Comment: Single and Two-Character .BIZ Domains
  • From: "Karl E. Peters" <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:54:02 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><FONT style="COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: " face=Verdana 
color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>R.e.&nbsp; .BIZ,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The only way for ICANN to even pretend to have any 
moral authority over the .biz of NeuStar is to negotiate some sort of 
settlement for Atlantic Root Network and Leah Gallegos from whom ICANN stole 
and then sold the TLD to NeuStar. It is well-known that&nbsp;ICANN and the 
Department of Commerce had full knowledge of the prior existence and 
operation&nbsp;of .biz, if for no other reason, Leah's testimony before 
congress and a number of personal exchanges with board members of that time on 
the subject. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Perhaps part of ICANN's delay in setting out new 
TLDs is an effort to see what TLDs they would be stealing for re-sale&nbsp;were 
registered&nbsp;and operated by those who are less likely to be able to sue 
them. That would be smarter than history allows for from ICANN though! More 
likely, they are trying to assure their big contributors that such new 
offerings would not significantly&nbsp;hurt&nbsp;their current&nbsp;revenue 
streams.&nbsp;&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>-Karl E. Peters</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>P.S. That story will not go away, ICANN! Neither will the horrible 
treatment you gave Chris Ambler over his .WEB&nbsp;application. It's a wonder 
ANYONE could be foolish enough to gamble with fees to ICANN when you consider 
how they do business! Better to spend the money in a casino where at least an 
occasional person walk out with some profit...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; 
BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: verdana" webmail="1">
<DIV>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: [ga] Public Comment: Single 
and Two-Character .BIZ Domains<BR>From: Glen_de_Saint_Géry 
&lt;Glen@xxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Wed, February 18, 2009 4:56 pm<BR>To: 
"ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" &lt;ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR><BR>[To: 
council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]<BR>[To: 
ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]<BR>[To: 
regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]<BR><BR><a 
href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-13feb09-en.htm"; 
target=_blank 
mce_href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-13feb09-en.htm";>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-13feb09-en.htm</a><BR><BR>Public
 Comment: Single and Two-Character .BIZ Domains<BR><BR>13 February 
2009<BR><BR>ICANN is today opening a public comment forum on a proposed 
amendment from NeuStar to Appendix 6 and 7 of the .BIZ Registry 
Agreement.<BR><BR>On 31 October 2008, ICANN posted for public information a 
request submitted by NeuStar through the Registry Services Evaluation Process 
for a phased allocation process for single and two-character names in .BIZ. The 
NeuStar proposal is available at <a 
href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/neustar-request-2008010-31oct08.pdf";
 target=_blank 
mce_href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/neustar-request-2008010-31oct08.pdf";>http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/neustar-request-2008010-31oct08.pdf</a>[PDF,
 100K].<BR><BR>As provided for by existing consensus policy (<a 
href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html"; target=_blank 
mce_href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html";>http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html</a>),
 ICANN has undertaken a preliminary determination to determine whether the 
proposal might raise significant security or stability, or competition issues. 
ICANN's determination is that the proposal did not raise such issues in 
.BIZ.<BR><BR>[Note that, from 13 June to 13 July 2008, ICANN conducted a public 
comment forum on a proposed single-character second-level domain names 
allocation framework (<a 
href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/proposed-scsld-allocation-framework-13jun08.htm";
 target=_blank 
mce_href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/proposed-scsld-allocation-framework-13jun08.htm";>http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/proposed-scsld-allocation-framework-13jun08.htm</a>),
 which supported the allocation single-character second-level domain names in 
existing registries and reviewed various allocation methods.]<BR><BR>The 
proposal requires an amendment the .BIZ List of Reserved TLD Strings (Appendix 
6) and a description of the phased allocation program is proposed to be 
inserted at the 7.2 of Appendix 7. A copy of the proposed amendment is 
available here [PDF, 24K]. Comments on the proposed amendment submitted to 
biz-alloc-amendment at icann.org will be considered until 15 Mar 2009 23:59 
UTC. Comments may be viewed at <a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/biz-alloc-amendment/"; target=_blank 
mce_href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/biz-alloc-amendment/";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/biz-alloc-amendment/</a>.<BR><BR>All
 documentation related to the NeuStar proposal is available at <a 
href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/#2008010"; target=_blank 
mce_href="http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/#2008010";>http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/#2008010</a><BR><BR>Glen
 de Saint Géry<BR>GNSO Secretariat<BR>gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/"; target=_blank 
mce_href="http://gnso.icann.org";>http://gnso.icann.org</a><BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></span></body></html>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>