<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN opens up Question Box for Mexico City meeting
- To: dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx, icann board <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN Policy staff <policy-staff@xxxxxxxxx>, "twomey@xxxxxxxxx" <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Dengate Thrush <barrister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Levins <paul.levins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN opens up Question Box for Mexico City meeting
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:24:02 -0800
Danny and all,
Sorry for my late response to your posted questions below.
Most of these questions have been ask over and over again, except
your #9, without a definitive answer by ICANN's Staff or Bod. As such
my question to you Danny, do you expect definitive answers to these
questions in Mexico, or ever?
Danny Younger wrote:
> Additional questions:
>
> 1. RAA amendment: ability to create new Registered Names suspended if
> Registrar is repeatedly/willfully in fundamental/material breach of its
> obligations at least three times within year. Why isnâ??t once sufficient?
>
> 2. RAA: In the event ICANN establishes a Code of Conduct for ICANN
> accredited registrars, Registrar shall abide by that Code; Will ICANN ever
> establish a registrar code of conduct?
>
> 3. RAA amendment: â??Upon execution of agreement, Registrar shall provide
> ICANN with a list of the names of Registrar's directors and officersâ??.
> Will such a list ever be made public?
>
> 4. RAA: â??Registrar shall abide by ICANN adopted specifications or
> policies prohibiting or restricting warehousing of or speculation in domain
> names by registrars.â?? Will such a policy be forthcoming?
>
> 5. RAA amendment: registrar shall display conspicuous notice when election
> is made to utilize proxy services that customer data is not being escrowed.
> Is Board comfortable with this loophole?
>
> 6. RAA amendment: â??In the event that ICANN publishes a webpage that
> identifies available registrant rights and responsibilitiesâ??. When does
> ICANN intend to publish such a page?
>
> 7. One would think that an organization committed to transparency would
> publicly post the registrar accreditation applications. Will this ever
> happen?
>
> 8. ICANN Staff issued a Draft Statement of Work for Funnel Review
> (indicating a review is consistent with ICANN's efforts to improve
> policies/procedures). Can we also expect a UDRP review?
>
> 9. RIRs are considering proposals to permit market-based address
> transfers. Does the Board have a view on this development?
>
> 10. When will ICANN articulate a transparent mechanism, that includes
> community agreement, for the disposition of excess new gTLD revenues, should
> there be any, given ICANNâ??s non-profit status?
>
>
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|