<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] 13 January 2009 Board Finance Committee Minutes
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ga] 13 January 2009 Board Finance Committee Minutes
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:29:48 -0800 (PST)
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-bfc-13jan09.htm
excerpts:
Reviewed comments from community on financial considerations of the new gTLD
applicant guidebook (RFP) and responses
General theme of financial-related comments was a desire to lower the
evaluation fee and annual registry fee
Proposed staff response is to recognize the complexity of the evaluation
process and to take a very conservative approach for the first round of
applications, with a review of the fees for the second round.
Staff recommend to hold steady on the US$185k evaluation fee. In relation to
the annual registry fees, staff suggests that, if a standard contract is
agreed, the recurring annual registry fees can be lowered to $25k plus $0.25
per transaction if over 50k transactions per annum.
Majority of committee in favor of proposed staff approach, but Raimundo Beca
disagrees – thinks that the evaluation fee should be reduced to exclude
recovery of historical costs, and that the evaluation fees should be collected
on a pay as you go basis instead of an up-front with refunds available basis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|