<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] [Fwd: Correction: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"]
- To: Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] [Fwd: Correction: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"]
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:55:08 -0800
Leslie and all,
Thanks for the update. I didn't have a problem for whatever reason
with the previous link however. < Shrug > I do hope others shall
read this publication, as they IMO would benifit from doing so.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Correction: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law
& Science"
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:02:08 -0800
From: Leslie Liang <lliang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: stlr-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <495E7CE0.50305@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
There was an error in the link below. Please use the following link:
http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf
> [STLR logo]
>
>
> The Stanford Technology Law Review is pleased to announce the
> publication of the following article:
>
> Robin Feldman, Historic Perspectives on Law & Science, 2009 STAN.
> TECH. L. REV. 1 (2009).
>
> Law has had a long and troubled relationship with science.
> The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our
> failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well
> documented. The cause of these problems, however, is less
> clear.
>
> I would like to suggest that the unsatisfying relationship
> of law and science can be attributed, at least in part, to
> law?s inadequate understanding of what constitutes science
> and law?s inflated view of the potential benefits of science
> for law. It is our failure to understand what science knows
> about its own enterprise, as well as our fervent hope that
> law could be something other than it is, that leads us
> astray.
>
> The full article may be accessed and downloaded in .pdf form at the
> following URL:
> http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf
>
> Copyright © 2009 Stanford Technology Law Review. All Rights Reserved.
>
--
Leslie Liang
Stanford Law School '09
714.872.3255 | lliang@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
stlr-update mailing list
stlr-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stlr-update
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|