ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] [Fwd: Correction: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"]

  • To: Ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] [Fwd: Correction: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law & Science"]
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:55:08 -0800

Leslie and all,

  Thanks for the update.  I didn't have a problem for whatever reason
with the previous link however. < Shrug >  I do hope others shall
read this publication, as they IMO would benifit from doing so.

-------- Original Message --------
   Subject: Correction: STLR Publication: "Historic Perspectives on Law
            & Science"
      Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 08:02:08 -0800
      From: Leslie Liang <lliang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        To: stlr-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <495E7CE0.50305@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

There was an error in the link below. Please use the following link:
http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf


>                              [STLR logo]
>
>
> The Stanford Technology Law Review is pleased to announce the
> publication of the following article:
>
> Robin Feldman, Historic Perspectives on Law & Science, 2009 STAN.
> TECH. L. REV. 1 (2009).
>
>      Law has had a long and troubled relationship with science.
>      The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our
>      failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well
>      documented. The cause of these problems, however, is less
>      clear.
>
>      I would like to suggest that the unsatisfying relationship
>      of law and science can be attributed, at least in part, to
>      law?s inadequate understanding of what constitutes science
>      and law?s inflated view of the potential benefits of science
>      for law. It is our failure to understand what science knows
>      about its own enterprise, as well as our fervent hope that
>      law could be something other than it is, that leads us
>      astray.
>
> The full article may be accessed and downloaded in .pdf form at the
> following URL:
> http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/feldman-historic-perspectives.pdf
>
> Copyright © 2009 Stanford Technology Law Review. All Rights Reserved.
>

--
Leslie Liang
Stanford Law School '09
714.872.3255 | lliang@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!"  Barack ( Berry ) Obama

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
stlr-update mailing list
stlr-update@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/stlr-update




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>