<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published(Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published(Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:05:32 -0700
Leo and all,
It doesn't matter if the wording only applies to IPv6 either. The
same principals apply as Michael correctly stated them. Making
IPv6 OR IPv4 address space a liquid asset is a huge error in
judgment. Such would only make RIR's and LIR's IP address
casinos.
Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On 08/10/2008 4:44, "michael.dillon@xxxxxx" <michael.dillon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>> It is contrary to the goals of this document
> >>> and is not in the interests of the Internet
> >>> community as a whole for address space to be
> >>> considered freehold property.
> >>
> >> Why should an IPv4 policy document take IPv6 policy documents
> >> into account? "Different circumstances".
> >
> > Same stakeholders. Same organization. And the statement does not
> > make any distinction between the two versions of IP.
>
> Actually, the first sentence to that document starts with the words: "This
> document defines registry policies for the assignment and allocation of
> globally unique IPv6 addresses". It is very clear that it doesn't apply to
> IPv4.
>
> The fact that IPv4 is almost completely allocated while IPv6 is almost
> completely empty seems relevant to me. I'd like to think that the policy
> took appropriate account of the circumstances.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leo Vegoda
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|