ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] VeriSign takes over .name registry??

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [ga] VeriSign takes over .name registry??
  • From: "Karl E. Peters" <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:58:08 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family: Verdana;" size="2" color="#000000" 
face="Verdana"><font style="font-family: Verdana;" size="2" color="#000000" 
face="Verdana"><blockquote webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; 
margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; 
font-family: verdana;">I am not very pleased with Verisign taking over .NAME 
if<br> true, but given that no one else really wanted it, and it has been<br> 
poorly managed due to poor oversight by ICANN in part, Verisign<br> taking over 
if true, is better than letting those registrants loose their<br> DN's.<br> 
<br> From our members perspective, .BIZ and .INFO badly need<br> to be 
re-delegated for obvious and frequently reported reasons.<br><br>Regards,<br> 
<br> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)<br> 
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<br> Abraham Lincoln<br> 
<br><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3">Here is a novel approach! . . . 
How about returning .biz to its rightful owner who ran it very nicely until 
stolen by ICANN and the Dept. of Commerce to give to the highest bidder? If we 
are really about what is right and fair, it seems returning stolen property is 
a good place to start. That issue will not go away as long as I breath and 
slowly type!!! &nbsp; -Karl E. Peters</font> </blockquote></font> </font> 
</span></body></html>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>